Are all human beings living in the simulated universe that is not real?December 18, 2018
Scientists are debating whether we humans are living in the real world or just in the midst of a simulated universe as the characters in game that are extremely sophisticated. Debates have taken place over the years about how much our universe is “real”. But until recently, Neil deGrasse Tyson has assembled prominent scientists to attempt the hypothesis and the way to test the unanswered question. The talk at the Museum of Natural History in New York City is part of a series of events called the Isaac Asimov Memorial Debate – held annually to remember the science fiction author Isaac Asimov. Accordingly, a section of researchers said that only on mathematical proof, our lives could be nothing more than a sophisticated electronic game. Neil deGrasse Tyson once wrote a paper titled “Constraints on the Universe as a Numerical Simulation,” in which, pointing out that if the universe was a model of simulation, we could measure predictable physical limits ) – they also can not avoid the nature of simulation. If physical limits were found, it could prove to be false. The Daily Mail said that when questioned whether the idea would scare the scientist, she said: “Oh no, I just thought it was an interesting idea.” Max Tegmark, a cosmologist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says: “If you look at how quarks (sometimes called quark particles) are a basic elementary particle and a fundamental component of matter move, all rules are mathematical. ” It means that there are grounds and signs that humanity in the universe can be revealed. “It made me wonder if I was a character in the game that started asking big questions about my gaming world, I would probably find the mathematical rule,” said James Gates, a physicist. theory at the University of Maryland. Although he did not believe in the idea, he was persuaded by his own mathematical knowledge to agree with Max Tegmark. He joked: “Why did I choose to study super-symmetry, quarks and leptons? Because they let me find myself unable to speak like mad Max (Mad Max). ” Therefore, the idea is not entirely meaningless. Meanwhile, Lisa Randall from Harvard University does not believe in the “virtual” universe assumption. The scientist thinks it only makes sense when we can test it. “We really are almost indistinguishable (reality or in the game), so I think the interesting question here is why do we feel like this (humanity is in the air simulation time) is the truth or think it is the truth to do? “. Max Tegmark says about 17 percent of the universe is virtual, and Randall claims the universe is 100 percent. Meanwhile a professor of philosophy at New York University, also joined in for comments. He suggested that the question of whether we are in a simulation is a modern version of Descartes’ question about the nature of reality. “We will not find convincing evidence that we are not in a simulation, because any evidence will be simulated,” he asserted. Everybody but the hypothetical universe we live in does not associate the black hole with the universe around as a piece of computer memory is captured and stored in a chip. According to Kham Pha.